[ad_1]
Lawyers employed by MrBeast to analyze claims that his former co-host groomed a teen have concluded that the allegations have been “without basis”, the star YouTuber has mentioned.
Ava Kris Tyson stopped working with MrBeast in July after different YouTubers accused her of sending inappropriate messages to a minor, reportedly then 13, when she was 20.
At the time, Tyson apologised for her “past actions”, however mentioned her behaviour by no means “extended beyond bad edgy jokes” and denied ever grooming anybody.
The alleged sufferer – who was named on-line – additionally defended her, saying the claims have been “massive lies” and that they’d by no means been “exploited or taken advantage of”.
MrBeast, 26, actual identify Jimmy Donaldson, hosts the largest channel on YouTube, with 325m subscribers, and is thought for making movies of stunts, challenges and acts of philanthropy.
Tyson, 28, who final yr got here out as transgender, has appeared frequently on the channel because it was launched in 2012.
After the preliminary claims in July, MrBeast mentioned he was “disgusted” by the “serious allegations of Ava Tyson’s behaviour online” and “opposed to such unacceptable acts”.
On Friday, he shared a letter on X from Quinn Emanuel Urqhart & Sullivan LLP, the regulation agency he employed to conduct an investigation into the claims.
The letter mentioned the agency had carried out 39 interviews with present and former staff of MrBeast’s firm and reviewed over 4.5m paperwork collected from cellphones, e-mails, and quite a lot of messaging platforms.
“Allegations of sexual misconduct… between company employees and minors are without basis. The allegations were soundly rejected, including by alleged victims,” it mentioned.
It added that allegations the corporate had knowingly employed “individuals with proclivities or histories towards illegal… conduct” have been “similarly without basis”.
The letter mentioned some “isolated instances of workplace harassment and misconduct were identified” and that, as soon as knowledgeable about them, the corporate had taken “swift and appropriate actions”.
Following the publication of the letter, the alleged sufferer of Tyson’s behaviour mentioned once more that the claims have been “completely false”.
“People used my name to make very serious allegations and claims without ever speaking to me,” they mentioned.
“It was incredibly difficult having my name thrown around in a public forum without being given the opportunity to share the truth.
“The non-public investigators reviewed all my [direct messages] and interactions with Kris.
“I was not groomed. These were false allegations made up by other people with my name thrown in them.”
Responding to the preliminary allegations in July, Tyson apologised for her “unacceptable social media posts, past actions, and to those who may feel betrayed by how I used to act online”, however added: “I never groomed anyone”.
“To lump these two factors together to create a narrative that my behavior extended beyond bad edgy jokes is disgusting and did not happen,” she mentioned.
“I have learned that my old humor is not acceptable. I cannot change who I was, but I can continue to work on myself.”
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink