[ad_1]
Stay forward of the pattern in trend and past with our free weekly Lifestyle Edit publication
Stay forward of the pattern in trend and past with our free weekly Lifestyle Edit publication
The age-old rule in faculties is that if a pupil brings in one thing, they should deliver sufficient for everybody.
In a latest Reddit submit shared to the favored “Am I the A**hole?” subreddit, a mom defined she usually offers her second grader with “everything he needs” for faculty, together with favours to throw throughout his Mardi Gras parade.
“I bought him $80 worth of throws for the parade so he will have stuff to throw throughout the whole ride but that wasn’t the case,” she wrote in her submit.
She continued: “A girl in his class threw all her stuff at once at the beginning of the parade and the teacher made my son (share) his stuff with her and she threw his stuff all at once leaving my son with nothing for the rest of the parade.”
This led to her contacting her child’s trainer to ask why that occurred. “She said with a nasty attitude ‘Well the girl had nothing left so I was not going to let her go without, it’s not fair’. Me: but my son deserves to go without!” the mom recalled.
The Reddit submit concluded with the mom asking whether or not or not she was overreacting together with her response to the incident.
“Shouldn’t she buy extra instead of taking away from other children or am I overreacting? She could’ve asked for donations. I do not know how to feel about the situation because I believe in sharing but this wasn’t sharing this was taking away from my son.”
After posting, many individuals took to the feedback to level out the trainer’s mistake in giving out the child’s objects.
“The girl needs to learn to make things last and if the teacher expected sharing then she should have asked for class donations for it not taken from another kid,” one remark learn.
“Why SHOULDN’T the girl learn that actions have consequences? A natural consequence of throwing out all of one’s things at the beginning is that she has none to throw out throughout the rest of the ride. So why did the teacher feel it wasn’t appropriate for the girl to suffer the consequences of her own actions? Why was your son made to suffer the consequences of her actions instead?” one other commenter agreed.
“I’ll tell you why. The teacher didn’t want to put up with hearing the girl whine about not having any more things to throw. The squeaky wheel gets the grease. It was easier to take from your child & give to the whining girl to shut her up than it was to tell the girl that that was the consequences of her actions & make her be quiet.”
“Your son’s teacher is a lazy bum & deserves to suffer consequences herself for her laziness & overall poor behaviour. She owes your son & you an apology – as well as whatever you paid for the items that she stole from your son &/or forced him to give to the whining girl,” the remark concluded.
Even a trainer chimed into the feedback part to defend the mom. “As a fellow teacher, I would never do something like that. Teacher should have bought extra beads for the class if they were so concerned,” they wrote.
“You can ask the student if he wants to share some, but you can’t force him to surrender his own for another student like that.”
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink