Candace Cameron Bure says AI frightens her, won’t be used in family films

2 minutes, 59 seconds Read

[ad_1]

Candace Cameron Bure finds synthetic intelligence “a little frightening” in the case of filmmaking.

Bure, 47, says she has “no intention” of utilizing AI to make motion pictures because the chief content material officer of Great American Family.

“I’ll be keeping my eye on it for sure,” she informed Fox News Digital whereas selling her look on FOX’s “We Are Family.” “I think it’s something that’s a little frightening to me … at the core of it.

“However, we’re utilizing fantastic writers to jot down our motion pictures, and I’ve no intention of utilizing or touching AI in the case of our filmmaking and writing scripts.”

CANDACE CAMERON BURE ON NAVIGATING EMPTY-NEST PHASE OF MARRIAGE

Candace Cameron Bure on the red carpet

Candace Cameron Bure has “no intention” of using artificial intelligence in making movies  (Stefanie Keenan/Getty Images for Inaugural Lemons Foundation Gala hosted by Taylor & Taylor Lautner)

still from Candace Cameron Bure podcast

Candace Cameron Bure is the chief content officer for Great American Family. (Candace Cameron Bure Podcast/YouTube screenshot)

Bure isn’t the only person worried about AI in the entertainment industry. Sam Register, president of Warner Bros Animation and Cartoon Network Studios, noted AI doesn’t work “higher” than an artist in terms of animation.

“As an animation studio, I simply suppose it’s essential we defend the artists and the artwork kind so long as we are able to,” Register said. “Because I feel we must always give jobs to individuals who actually do this, and to allow them to get their entry-level expertise.

“Animation’s a visual medium. But, so far, I haven’t seen anything AI can do visually that an artist doesn’t do better currently.”

LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS

Nicole Brown, president of TriStar Pictures, stated she desires to work “with human beings.”

“I mean, movies are about someone’s experience, someone’s perspective, someone’s vision. So, even though there was a lot of discussion about AI during strikes, as someone building content, I want to work with human beings,” she stated.

Justine Bateman smiles on the red carpet in Ontario in a printed top with transparent sleeves

Justine Bateman believes AI has “no place” in the Hollywood trade. (Emma McIntyre/SHJ2021 through Getty Images)

Actress Justine Bateman is adamantly against AI in Hollywood.

“I think AI has no place in Hollywood at all. To me, tech should solve problems that humans have,” the previous “Family Ties” actress informed Fox News Digital.

WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)?

Using ChatGPT or any … software that’s using AI to write screenplays, using that in place of a writer is not solving a problem. We don’t have a lack of writers. We don’t have a lack of actors. We don’t have a lack of directors. We don’t have a lack of talented people.”

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

The leisure trade was dropped at a halt in 2023 after the Writers Guild of America and SAG-AFTRA went on strike.

Control over the usage of synthetic intelligence was essentially the most hard-fought concern in the prolonged, methodical negotiations and have become the principle driver of dissent throughout the voting for SAG-AFTRA members.

Under the brand new Writers Guild of America contract, uncooked, AI-generated story traces won’t be thought to be “literary material,” a time period in contracts for scripts and different story types a screenwriter produces. This means they gained’t be competing with computer systems for display screen credit. Nor will AI-generated tales be thought of “source” materials, their contractual language for the novels, video video games or different works that writers might adapt into scripts.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

[ad_2]

Source hyperlink

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *