[ad_1]
President Biden lashed out at members of the Supreme Court for their controversial Dobbs choice during his State of the Union address on Thursday evening. It mirrored the actions of former President Barack Obama, who rebuked a call made by justices on the High Court during his 2010 State of the Union address to Congress.
During Thursday’s high-profile speech from the Capitol, which was attended by six sitting Supreme Court justices, Biden spoke at size about abortion and girls’s well being care. At one level, the president took direct purpose on the justices over their June 2022 choice to overturn Roe v. Wade and implied they weren’t conscious of the “electoral or political power” girls in America maintain.
“With all due respect, justices, women are not without … electoral or political power,” Biden stated. “You’re about to realize just how much.”
BORDER PATROL UNION BOSS SAYS BIDEN ‘SLAPPED EVERY AMERICAN IN THE FACE’ DURING STATE OF THE UNION
President Biden’s choice to focus on Supreme Court justices during his State of the Union address on Thursday mirrored that of former President Barack Obama in 2010. (Getty Images)
“Those bragging about overturning Roe v. Wade have no clue about the power of women, but they found out when reproductive freedom was on the ballot and we won in 2022 and we won in 2020 and when we win again in 2024,” he added.
Biden’s remarks drew a right away spherical of applause and a standing ovation from Democrats, in addition to members of his cupboard, who had gathered within the House chamber to listen to the president’s remarks.
The six justices in attendance — Chief Justice John Roberts and Associate Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Ketanji Brown Jackson — remained seated and appeared on as Biden vowed to “restore Roe v. Wade as the law of the land” ought to he be given a “Congress that supports the right to choose.”
Though unusual, Biden’s transfer to directly goal the justices for a call they’d made resembled the actions of Obama when he expressed frustration with a Supreme Court ruling during one among his personal State of the Union addresses.
Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court take heed to President Biden’s State of the Union address within the House Chamber on the Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Thursday. (Julia Nikhinson/Bloomberg by way of Getty Images)
BIDEN CAUGHT ON HOT MIC REVEALING PRIVATE ‘COME TO JESUS’ CONVERSATION WITH NETANYAHU
While addressing a joint session of Congress in January 2010, Obama criticized the court docket’s 5-4 ruling in Citizens United, which slashed company marketing campaign spending limits.
“With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama stated from the chamber of the House of Representatives that yr.
“I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people. And I’d urge Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps correct some of these problems,” he added.
President Barack Obama delivers his State of the Union address to a Joint Session of Congress on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 27, 2010. (Toni L. Sandys/The Washington Post by way of Getty Images)
In obvious disagreement with Obama’s remarks on the time, Justice Samuel Alito could possibly be seen mouthing what gave the impression to be the phrases “not true.”
Alito, together with Justices Amy Coney-Barrett and Clarence Thomas, didn’t attend Biden’s Thursday night address. Alito, who’s a part of the court docket’s conservative majority, has not attended a State of the Union address since 2010.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Following Obama’s 2010 remarks, Biden, who served as vp on the time, reportedly argued during an look on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that Obama “didn’t question the integrity of the court. He questioned the judgment of it.”
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink