Prince Harry loses legal challenge against Home Office over security arrangements

Get the free Morning Headlines e-mail for information from our reporters internationally

Sign as much as our free Morning Headlines e-mail

The Duke of Sussex has misplaced a High Court challenge against the Government over a choice to vary the extent of his taxpayer-funded private security when he visits the UK.

Prince Harry took legal motion against the Home Office over the February 2020 resolution of the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec) that he ought to obtain a distinct diploma of safety when within the nation.

Following a listening to in December, retired High Court choose Sir Peter Lane issued his ruling over the case on the Royal Courts Of Justice in central London on Wednesday.

The duke’s attorneys beforehand instructed the courtroom that he was “singled out” and handled “less favourably” within the resolution to vary the extent of his taxpayer-funded private security.

They mentioned a failure to hold out a threat evaluation and totally contemplate the impression of a “successful attack” on him meant the method to his safety was “unlawful and unfair”.

The courtroom was instructed that Harry believes his youngsters can not “feel at home” within the UK whether it is “not possible to keep them safe” there.

The Government had mentioned Harry’s declare must be dismissed, arguing that Ravec – which falls underneath the Home Office’s remit – was entitled to conclude the duke’s safety must be “bespoke” and thought of on a “case-by-case” foundation.

Home Office attorneys mentioned the duke was not a member of the group of individuals whose “security position” was underneath common evaluate by Ravec, however he was “brought back within the cohort in the appropriate circumstances”.

The courtroom was instructed that it was “simply incorrect” to counsel that there was no proof that the difficulty of impression was thought of, including that the dying of Diana, Princess of Wales – Harry’s mom – was raised as a part of the choice.

In his 52-page partially redacted ruling, Sir Peter on Wednesday rejected the duke’s case and concluded Ravec’s method was not irrational nor procedurally unfair. He mentioned Harry’s attorneys had taken “an inappropriate, formalist interpretation of the Ravec process”, including: “The ‘bespoke’ process devised for the claimant in the decision of 28 February 2020 was, and is, legally sound.”

Ravec has delegated accountability from the Home Office over the availability of protecting security arrangements for members of the royal household and others, with involvement from the Metropolitan Police, the Cabinet Office and the royal family.

The majority of the proceedings in December had been held in non-public, with out the general public or press current, due to confidential proof over security measures being concerned within the case.

The security case is certainly one of three current High Court instances introduced by the duke, alongside claims over allegations of illegal info gathering against publishers News Group Newspapers (NGN) and Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL).

Earlier this month, Harry settled the remaining elements of his cellphone hacking declare against Mirror Group Newspapers.

It got here after the duke determined in January to withdraw a libel declare against ANL over a February 2022 Mail on Sunday article about his legal challenge against the Home Office.

Harry, who was not current on the December listening to, lives in North America with spouse Meghan and their youngsters after the couple introduced they had been stepping again as senior royals in January 2020.

More follows on this breaking information story…