Lindsay Hoyle newest: What happened during Gaza vote and why is Commons speaker facing calls to resign

Stephen Flynn described his temper after the talk as “scunnered”, a Scottish slang time period that means upset or irritated.

“I am sure everyone at home watching is a bit scunnered too because the reality is that we were here to discuss something much bigger than ourselves, much bigger than this Parliament,” he added.

The SNP MP went on: “It was the safety of civilian life in Gaza, the desire and the need for that immediate ceasefire, something which we have been pushing for for months and instead we have turned into a complete pantomime, a pantomime driven by the fact that the Labour Party could not bring themselves to vote for an SNP motion, so forced the speaker of the House of Commons to deviate from the procedures of this House.”

Following the speaker’s apology within the Commons, Mr Flynn had mentioned he would take “significant convincing” that the speaker’s place was “not now intolerable”.

Outside he added: “I am going to rightly give him the opportunity to do that because he is someone who I have enormous respect for.

“I have until today a very good personal relationship with him and I am sure that that will continue, but he let us all down tonight, and as such instead of talking about the situation in Gaza we are instead talking about him and what has happened with him and the Labour Party today and that is not good enough.”

Fists clenched, eyes bulging, shouts of “shame” and “disgrace”, MPs waving their arms in fury… you’d have to return to the darkest days of the Brexit battles in 2019 to recall comparable scenes after a speaker’s ruling.

But it was not spiky former chair John Bercow who drew the howls of concern this afternoon. It was Lindsay Hoyle, his genial, cuddly and hard-to-dislike successor – the person who was chosen exactly as a result of he embodied the very reverse traits of Bercow.

Sir Lindsay had simply introduced that he would permit a Labour modification to a Scottish National Party movement on an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza, regardless that the day’s debate had been allotted to the SNP. Behind the arcane parliamentary procedures, the purpose was that he had simply let Keir Starmer off a mighty huge hook.

Read the complete article right here:

Stephen Flynn has referred to as for an investigation into the chaos within the Commons on Wednesday following a debate on Gaza led by his social gathering.

The SNP Westminster chief steered Labour had sought to affect commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle into taking the unprecedented step of granting a number of votes during a debate on a Gaza ceasefire led by his Commons.

Mr Flynn advised the PA information company: “Every single member of Parliament knows that (Sir) Lindsay Hoyle was meeting with Sir Keir Starmer and Alan Campbell, the Labour chief whip, before a decision was taken today.

“Indeed it was suggested to me that was a reason the speaker was jumping in and out of the speaker’s chair in advance of proceedings, which will obviously all be on camera for everyone to reflect upon.

“I think we probably need a wee bit of an investigation into what has happened here, and all those individuals who have been involved, but again, I am sure during the private conversation that I have with the speaker he will be able to hopefully alleviate some of my concerns in relation to that.”

Mr Flynn claimed he had written to Labour chief Sir Keir on the weekend inviting the social gathering to talk about his Opposition Day movement forward of the talk, however added: “He has not even replied because he was obviously busy trying to put pressure on the speaker to negate any discussion about the SNP’s motion.

“It has been posited to me that the SNP have been playing games on this, when in actual fact we are the ones who have been consistent in our view for months, and anyone watching the House of Commons today will know exactly who has been playing the games, and it is the incoming Labour government.”

Sir Keir Starmer accused the Tories and SNP of “choosing political games over serious solutions”.

Following chaos in the Commons that saw SNP and some Conservative MPs walk out of the chamber, the Labour leader said in a statement: “Today was a chance for Parliament to unite and speak with one voice on the horrendous situation in Gaza and Israel.

“It was in that spirit that Labour put forward an amendment calling for an immediate humanitarian ceasefire. One that that will last, that would require both sides to observe it, that would demand hostages are returned, that aid gets into Gaza, that said Israel has a right to be protected against a repeat of October 7th and – crucially – that requires a road map for a two-state solution. It is a serious plan for such an incredibly serious situation.

“Unfortunately, the Conservatives and the SNP decided to walk out hand-in-hand, refusing to vote on this serious matter, yet again choosing political games over serious solutions.

“It is clear the only party with a plan for the challenges facing Britain – whether here or abroad – is Labour. And it is clearer than ever that it is only Labour that will put country over party and silly political games in order to deliver.”

Sir Lindsay Hoyle apologised to MPs and vowed to hold talks with senior party figures amid calls to “resign”.

He said: “I thought I was doing the right thing and the best thing, and I regret it, and I apologise for how it’s ended up.”

He mentioned he took the choice to permit all sides to “express their views” and that he was “very, very concerned about the security” of MPs who’ve obtained private threats over their stance on the Gaza battle.

The row erupted when Sir Lindsay Hoyle determined the Commons would first vote on Labour’s modification calling for an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” earlier than shifting on to additional votes on the SNP’s authentic movement and then a authorities proposal looking for an “immediate humanitarian pause”.

He disregarded warnings from the House of Commons Clerk over the unprecedented nature of the transfer, which provoked uproar within the chamber.

Labour’s modification ended up passing unopposed with out a formal vote after the federal government pulled its participation.

The Speaker of the House of Commons is underneath strain over his dealing with of a debate on Gaza, which resulted in MPs passing Labour’s modification calling for an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” amid scenes of chaos.

The movement was permitted however solely after Sir Lindsay Hoyle upended parliamentary conference by choosing Labour’s bid to amend an SNP movement on the Israel-Hamas warfare.

His resolution sparked fury from the Conservative and SNP benches, who accused him of serving to Sir Keir Starmer keep away from one other damaging revolt over the Middle East challenge.

Sir Lindsay issued an apology after a day of acrimony however continues to face calls to resign.

Stephen Flynn has referred to as for an investigation into the chaos within the Commons on Wednesday following a debate on Gaza led by his social gathering.

The SNP Westminster chief steered Labour had sought to affect Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle into taking the unprecedented step of granting a number of votes during a debate on a Gaza ceasefire led by his Commons.

It adopted uproar within the Commons, after the Speaker defied expectations by deciding MPs would first vote on Labour’s calls for an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” forward of a Government modification looking for an “immediate humanitarian pause” to the Israel-Hamas battle which may pave the way in which for a extra everlasting cease in preventing.

Read the complete article right here:

The Commons Leader mentioned Sir Lindsay had “raised temperatures” and put MPs in a “more difficult position” by choosing Labour’s bid to amend the SNP movement calling for an “immediate ceasefire” in Gaza and Israel.

It had been anticipated Sir Lindsay would choose simply the Government’s modification looking for an “immediate humanitarian pause” to the Israel-Hamas battle, which may pave the way in which for a extra everlasting cease in preventing.

Read the complete article right here: