[ad_1]
President Biden retained paperwork marked “secret” and “confidential” related to Ukraine and China, in accordance to Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report.
Hur, who launched his report to the general public on Thursday after months of investigating, didn’t advocate prison expenses towards Biden for mishandling and retaining categorized paperwork — and acknowledged that he would not convey expenses towards Biden even when he weren’t within the Oval Office.
Those records included categorized paperwork about navy and overseas coverage in Afghanistan and different nations, amongst different records related to nationwide safety and overseas coverage, which Hur stated implicated “sensitive intelligence sources and methods.”
President Biden speaks throughout an occasion at Earth Rider Brewery in Superior, Wisconsin, US, on Thursday, Jan. 25, 2024. (Nicole Neri/Bloomberg through Getty Images)
But Biden additionally saved categorized paperwork related to Ukraine and China.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., who’s at present co-leading the impeachment inquiry towards Biden, had requested Hur final 12 months if any of the categorized records Biden held have been related to the nations that his household performed enterprise with.
Comer is now demanding “unfettered access to these documents to determine if President Biden’s retention of sensitive materials were used to help the Bidens’ influence peddling.”
Hunter Biden, joined the board of Ukrainian pure gasoline agency Burisma Holdings in June 2014. Hunter Biden additionally had joint enterprise ventures with Chinese vitality corporations.
This picture from Special Council Robert Hur’s investigation launched by the Department of Justice on Thursday, February 8, 2024 exhibits Joe Biden’s Delaware storage on December 21, 2022. (U.S. Department of Justice)
With regard to the Ukraine paperwork, in accordance to the particular counsel report, Biden saved a September 2014 memo with the topic line “U.S. Energy Assistance to Ukraine.” That memo was marked as confidential.
Biden, on the time, did run U.S.-Ukraine coverage.
The report additionally states that the FBI positioned a inexperienced file folder Biden saved, labeled “Ukraine 2/19/15.” That folder was inside an “unlabeled green hanging folder.” Also, inside that folder was a purple file folder labeled “VP Personal.”
In the “VP Personal” file folder was a phone name sheet from Dec. 12, 2015, and speaking factors for a name with Ukrainian Prime Minister Yatsenyuk. There is a handwritten word connected addressed to Biden’s govt assistant that states: “Get copy of this conversation from Sit Rm for my Records please.” The word is signed “Joe.” That doc was marked as “Secret.”
Attached to that doc was one other, dated Dec. 11, 2015. The report describes that doc as “a transcript documenting the substance of a Dec. 11, 2015 call between Mr. Biden and Ukrainian Prime Minister Yatsenyuk.” The doc is marked “CONFIDENTIAL” and “EYES ONLY DO NOT COPY.”
NO CHARGES FOR BIDEN AFTER SPECIAL COUNSEL PROBE INTO IMPROPER HANDLING OF CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS
The particular counsel’s report analyzes the paperwork, saying there “is reasonable doubt that Mr. Biden willfully retained” the paperwork.
“Mr. Biden’s handwritten note does not request that executive assistant save the classified call sheet containing talking points for the call (A9) in his records; rather, he only requested the transcript of the phone call itself,” the report states. “And no jury could reasonably find that the substance of the call between Mr. Biden and the Ukrainian Prime Minister was national defense information.”
This picture from Special Council Robert Hur’s investigation launched by the Department of Justice on Thursday, February 8, 2024 exhibits containers inside Joe Biden’s storage containing categorized Afghanistan paperwork on December 21, 2022. (U.S. Department of Justice)
The report states that Biden and the Ukrainian prime minister “exchanged pleasantries and the Prime Minister heaped praise upon Mr. Biden for his December 9, 2015 speech to Ukraine’s parliament.”
“They did not engage in a substantive policy discussion. There may be technical or nuanced reasons to maintain the classification of the call, but no reasonable jury could conclude the call or its contents were national defense information after the end of Obama administration, or that by asking for a transcript of the call Biden intended to retain national defense information,” the report states.
Biden, on Dec. 9, 2015, gave a speech during which he mentioned corruption in Ukraine.
“And it’s not enough to set up a new anti-corruption bureau and establish a special prosecutor fighting corruption,” Biden stated within the speech. “The Office of the General Prosecutor desperately needs reform.”
Joe and son Hunter Biden. (AP Photo/Andrew Harnik)
In that speech, Biden additionally stated Ukraine’s “energy sector needs to be competitive, ruled by market principles — not sweetheart deals.”
“It’s not enough to push through laws to increase transparency with regard to official sources of income,” he stated. “Senior elected officials have to remove all conflicts between their business interest and their government responsibilities. Every other democracy in the world — that system pertains.”
At the time, Burisma Holdings was below investigation by Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin. Several months later, in March 2016, Biden efficiently pressured Ukraine to take away Shokin. At the time Shokin was investigating Burisma Holdings, Hunter had a extremely profitable position on the board receiving tens of hundreds of {dollars} per thirty days.
Biden, on the time, threatened to withhold $1 billion of essential U.S. assist if Shokin was not fired.
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in,’ I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. Biden recollected the dialog throughout an occasion for the Council on Foreign Relations in 2018.
“Well, son of a b—-, he got fired,” Biden stated through the occasion. “And they put in place someone who was solid at the time.”
Biden allies preserve the then-vice president pushed for Shokin’s firing due to issues the Ukrainian prosecutor went straightforward on corruption, and say that his firing, on the time, was the coverage place of the U.S. and worldwide group.
House Oversight and Accountability Committee Chair James Comer, R-Ky. (AP Photo/Mariam Zuhaib)
But Comer blasted the invention of this info as “concerning” and questioned the timeline.
“It’s no secret Hunter Biden made millions by sitting on the board of Burisma when Joe Biden was Vice President and that Burisma benefited from the firing of Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin,” Comer advised Fox News Digital, saying it’s “concerning Joe Biden retained classified materials related to Ukraine around the same timeframe he called for the firing of Viktor Shokin.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“The Justice Department must provide Congress with unfettered access to these documents to determine if President Biden’s retention of sensitive materials were used to help the Bidens’ influencing peddling schemes,” Comer stated.
Meanwhile, with regard to China, Biden retained a memo with the topic, “Engagement with China in the Second Term.” That doc “suggests activities Vice President Biden could do in his second term to “construct on my work final 12 months by participating with China’s leaders within the second time period.” The document was marked as confidential.
Comer’s investigation and the House impeachment inquiry is probing Hunter Biden and James Biden’s Chinese business dealings, and whether Joe Biden was involved or had knowledge of the ventures.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink