[ad_1]
After operating an opinion piece questioning Taylor Swift’s sexuality, The New York Times rapidly discovered what it means to have dangerous blood with a faithful fan base.
Swifties went scorched earth on the publication, irate that they might publish an article suggesting Swift could be homosexual. The entirety of the piece was a probe into Swift’s each transfer since changing into well-known, positing that sure selections or statements made by Swift have been really sublte clues referencing her hidden sexuality.
A consultant for Swift didn’t instantly reply to Fox News Digital’s request for remark.
The article generated large backlash on social media, with customers sharing their vitriol.
“Just cancelled my subscription. This article is sexist and grossly inappropriate,” one particular person posted on X.
TAYLOR SWIFT IS TIME’S PERSON OF THE YEAR: 5 REVELATIONS FROM HER FIRST INTERVIEW IN YEARS
The New York Times ran an opinion piece suggesting Taylor Swift could be homosexual, enraging her fans. (Jeff Kravitz/TAS23/Getty Images for TAS Rights Management)
“Wow… throwing ethics out the window early this year,” one other person commented.
Other fans have been horrified {that a} prestigious outlet resembling The New York Times would publish one thing so egregious.
“This essay is a fireable offense – poorly written, horribly invasive, and objectionable in myriad ways. It is both galling and weird that NYT would publish a speculative piece on someone’s gender identity. This is beneath the editorial standards of NYT Opinion. Do Better,” they admonished.
“I’m not a big fan of hers but I am totally disgusted by this & will be canceling my New York Times subscription tomorrow morning,” one other revealed.
An opinion piece in The New York Times examined all the methods through which Taylor Swift could be a closeted homosexual particular person. (Getty Images)
LIKE WHAT YOU’RE READING? CLICK HERE FOR MORE ENTERTAINMENT NEWS
The public’s fascination with Swift’s romantic life has lengthy remained tabloid fodder, a lot to the singer’s chagrin. When Swift re-released her album “1989 (Taylor’s Version)” this previous October, initially launched in 2014, she additionally shared a prologue that described how the media’s fascination with her personal life had developed and the way she had channeled that into her music.
“It became clear to me that for me there was no such thing as casual dating, or even having a male friend who you platonically hang out with. If I was seen with him, it was assumed I was sleeping with him. And so I swore off hanging out with guys, dating, flirting, or anything that could be weaponized against me by a culture that claimed to believe in liberating women but consistently treated me with the harsh moral codes of the Victorian era,” she wrote.
Taylor Swift was ceaselessly noticed with her well-known woman squad throughout the launch of her fifth studio album, “1989.” (John Shearer/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR THE ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER
To change the narrative, Swift spent extra time with her illustrious woman squad, or pal group, stuffed with extremely profitable feminine actors, musicians and fashions.
“Being a consummate optimist, I assumed I could fix this if I simply changed my behavior. I swore off dating and decided to focus only on myself, my music, my growth, and my female friendships,” Swift continued in her prologue. “If I only hung out with my female friends, people couldn’t sensationalize or sexualize that – right? I would learn later on that people could and people would.”
Fans on social media have been fast to reference this explicit message made by Swift along with The New York Times article.
“Except she asked people to stop doing this. Read the 1989 prolong. She has only dated men publicly. This is ignoring public statements from the singer. Misrepresenting events and ignoring obvious answers,” one particular person lamented to X.
“Please read her 1989 prologue again,” one other particular person implored.
If I solely hung out with my feminine associates, individuals could not sensationalize or sexualize that – proper? I’d study later on that individuals may and other people would.
The article, written by Anna Marks, additionally addressed Swift’s newest relationship with Kansas City Chiefs tight finish Travis Kelce. Marks questioned if the relationship is a “Romance for the ages? strategic brand partnership? performance art for entertainment’s sake?”
Swift solely not too long ago confirmed that she and Kelce have been an merchandise lengthy earlier than the public had any clue, in a uncommon second of transparency, confirming their romantic relationship.
Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift first began hanging out after the tight finish referred to as her out on his podcast in the summer season of 2023. (Gotham/Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
Swift has not addressed the opinion piece. She is anticipated to attend the Golden Globe Awards – the place she is a nominee – Sunday evening.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink