Aristocrats have increased their influence in Britain over the past 150 years, research claims

Get the free Morning Headlines e-mail for information from our reporters throughout the world

Sign as much as our free Morning Headlines e-mail

Aristocrats have turn into extra influential in British society over the past 150 years, in response to new research that appears at the lives of notable individuals.

Academics have studied the entries to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, a reference e book which information profiles of over 60,000 individuals who have considerably formed British life. They discovered that hereditary friends are actually 292 instances extra doubtless than non-aristocrats to be listed in the e book.

This is a rise on their influence in the nineteenth century, when hereditary friends had been 221 instances extra more likely to function than the common particular person.

Dr Matthew Bond and Dr Julien Morton, from London South Bank University, calculated what number of hereditary friends who died in the years 2008-18 had been added to the Oxford Dictionary as a result of their notable life achievements.

They then checked out what number of non-aristocrats who died throughout the similar time ended up in the e book. They then repeated this for the years 1858-1867 to see how influential aristocrats had been in comparison with the remainder of the inhabitants in the nineteenth Century.

They solely checked out deaths of individuals aged 35 and older to keep away from the distorting impact of the massive variety of little one deaths in the nineteenth century. They excluded life friends, who have been awarded peerages, and in addition excluded any aristocrats who had been the first in their line.

Dr Morton mentioned that his research was in distinction to the frequent perception “amongst historians and the wider public that the British aristocracy are a fallen group whose wealth, power and status have diminished so substantially that they have become entirely marginal to British life”.

Instead, his work confirmed that “the British aristocracy have seen an increase in their relative advantage compared to the UK population”.

Recent additions to the National Biography embrace Lydia Hayward, a number one scriptwriter in the British movie trade between 1920 and 1942, and George King, a sailor who was at the Battle of Trafalgar.

Recent aristocratic entries embrace Lady Elizabeth Cavendish, lady-in-waiting to Princess Margaret, and Lady Cylla Dugdale, an artist and aunt of present overseas secretary Lord David Cameron.

Researchers mentioned that the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography was indicator of influence as aristocrats earned their entries by their actions and weren’t routinely included.

“There are no real attempts to measure status of elite groups over time by historians, and so the use of something like the ODNB becomes particularly powerful and important. There is a higher bar of entry for the ODNB, higher than for Who’s Who, where, for example, aristocrats are automatically included,” Dr Morton advised the British Sociological Association’s annual convention.

Dr Bond speculated that the enhance of aristocratic influence may very well be all the way down to their “historical closeness to political power” or “it could be that they are using connections to old boys’ networks”.

He added: “It could be that the hereditary aristocracy pulled back from out-and-out fights with the forces of democracy after the early 20th century, and instead concentrated on less visible forces of power such as wealth and status.”