Woman praised for rejecting her husband’s baby name suggestion

Stay forward of the pattern in style and past with our free weekly Lifestyle Edit publication

Stay forward of the pattern in style and past with our free weekly Lifestyle Edit publication

A soon-to-be mom is being applauded for standing her floor and refusing to make use of the name her husband instructed for their daughter.

In hopes she would discover readability on whether or not she was proper or incorrect for taking pictures down her accomplice’s request, the 36-year-old lady took to Reddit’s discussion board, Am I The A**gap, for recommendation.

The pregnant lady began by explaining she and her 38-year-old husband have been anticipating their first little one quickly – a lady. The two of them have been stoked to seek out out their baby’s gender, however now, it has brought on points.

“See, when we first started talking about names, the ‘boy name’ was immediately decided: Stuart Jr, after my husband,” she admitted. “But, for a girl, things got murky.”

Though their first born wasn’t going to be a boy, the Redditor’s husband needed to stay with their unique alternative however tweak it. His resolution was to name their daughter “Stuarta.”

“No, you’re not having a stroke. Apparently, his logic is that since Stuart ends in ‘t,’ we can just add an ‘a’ to make it feminine,” the Reddit consumer admitted. “I tried explaining why that doesn’t quite work, how it sounds more like a furniture brand than a human name, how she’d be endlessly correcting people and explaining its origin.”

According to her husband, his moniker proposal was “unique” and honoured him. The Reddit consumer wasn’t happy. She began providing different names, some that had the identical “sound or meaning” as “Stuart.” Unfortunately, her husband wasn’t desirous about any of them.

“Now, I love my husband dearly, and I understand wanting to honour family,” the unique poster famous. “But I can’t imagine subjecting our daughter to a lifetime of awkward stares and endless questions about her ‘unusual’ name. I also worry about potential bullying and the impact it could have on her self-esteem.”

Lastly, the Redditor added how her husband has now instructed naming their daughter after him. “I think it’s terrible and will set her up for a lifetime of awkwardness,” she mentioned.

Other Reddit customers jumped on the chance so as to add their opinions and provide recommendations for how one can assist the unique poster. Most folks agreed that her daughter couldn’t be named “Stuarta,” and he or she was due to this fact not within the incorrect for refusing her husband.

“Naming a child is a two yes and one no situation. Means you need two times yes for a name to be it and one no to make sure that name is not the name you choose. Works both ways if you’d ask me,” one particular person commented. “Also, I am not a fan of naming the first name of a child after a parent.”

Another proclaimed: “Here’s the thing though. WTF should any child HAVE to be named after him in some way? I get the tradition thing but this is just weird behaviour.”

“This,” a harsh reader began. “So when she’s old enough to have to explain why she was named Stuarta, what else is there for her to say but, ‘My father has such a big ego, he insisted his first child be named after him, no matter the emotional damage it would cause a daughter.’”

“I’m guessing the kids will have his last name, too. So why does he also get to name their first names after himself?” a fourth questioned.

One viewer bluntly mentioned: “Girl, it is super simple. He gets to choose the name when he pushes out the baby.”