Prince Harry lawyers say Rupert Murdoch ‘personally involved in wrongdoing cover-up’

Get the free Morning Headlines electronic mail for information from our reporters the world over

Sign as much as our free Morning Headlines electronic mail

Media magnate Rupert Murdoch was personally involved in a cover-up of wrongdoing, Prince Harry’s lawyers have alleged.

The Duke of Sussex and greater than 40 different individuals are suing News Group Newspapers (NGN) over accusations of illegal invasions of privateness by its tabloids, The Sun and the now-defunct News of the World, from the mid-Nineties till 2016.

The lawyers declare Mr Murdoch, 93, gave “knowingly false” proof and that Rebekah Brooks, the chief govt of News UK, News Corp’s British newspaper arm, “lied and/or gave deliberately misleading evidence” at her felony trial in 2014.

In paperwork submitted to the High Court, the claimants additionally recognized Will Lewis, a former News International govt and now writer of the Washington Post, as being involved in the alleged cover-up.

The case in opposition to NGN is because of go to a trial, lasting as much as eight weeks, starting in January. It is one in all six authorized battles the prince has involved himself in.

The lawyers have additionally claimed that a pc exhausting drive belonging to Ms Brooks went lacking in May 2011 and that NGN gave false proof to the police to “explain away” its disappearance.

The different claimants embody British movie director Guy Ritchie, actor Hugh Grant, a number of former senior politicians and campaigner Doreen Lawrence, who, together with Harry, can be a part of a separate lawsuit in opposition to the writer of the Daily Mail.

Their lawyers have requested Judge Timothy Fancourt for permission so as to add new allegations to their case in opposition to the corporate, together with that senior executives gave deceptive proof to parliament and a public inquiry.

NGN is resisting the appliance, its lawyers saying the modifications are “wholly unnecessary” and “positively undesirable”.

An organization spokesperson mentioned the claimants had made the allegations in opposition to present and former NGN workers “in a scurrilous and cynical attack on their integrity”.

“These allegations have nothing to do with seeking compensation for victims of phone-hacking or unlawful information-gathering and should be viewed with considerable caution,” the spokesperson added.

The firm’s lawyers mentioned the brand new allegations, introducing for the primary time 200 journalists, executives and personal investigators, have been pointless, disproportionate and irrelevant.

“It has become increasingly clear that at least some members of the claimant group appear to be using this document as a vehicle for wider campaigning interests against the tabloid press,” Anthony Hudson, NGN’s lawyer, informed the court docket.

Mr Hudson mentioned in court docket filings that allegations in relation to Ms Brooks and others successfully required NGN “to enter into the re-running of criminal trials or an inquiry into an inquiry”.

In 2011, NGN apologised for phone-hacking by journalists on the News of the World, which Mr Murdoch shut down amid a backlash.

NGN has since settled greater than 1,300 claims, however the group has at all times rejected allegations of any wrongdoing by workers at The Sun. Ms Brooks, a former Sun editor, was discovered not responsible of hacking and different crimes following an eight-month trial in 2014.

David Sherborne, the lawyer for Harry and the opposite claimants, informed the court docket each Mr Murdoch and Ms Brooks had recognized NGN’s authentic assertion that simply “one rogue reporter” was involved in illegal information-gathering was false.

They and different executives have been “dishonest in making these statements since they knew them to be false at the time they were made”, the brand new allegations mentioned.

Mr Hudson mentioned the amended claims have been primarily based on “ancient documents” and in earlier variations, Mr Murdoch was solely referred to in passing with “no allegations against him”.

Mr Justice Fancourt has beforehand dominated that Harry couldn’t deliver a declare in relation to phone-hacking in opposition to NGN and that he couldn’t depend on an alleged “secret agreement” between the royal household and senior executives working for Mr Murdoch.

In written arguments, David Sherborne, representing Harry and the opposite individuals bringing claims, mentioned it had already been alleged that the exhausting drive of Ms Brooks’ laptop was “sequestered and/or destroyed deliberately in order to conceal her and others’ knowledge of wrongdoing at NGN”.

The court docket was informed additional paperwork included a 2021 witness assertion from an IT engineer at NGN who mentioned the exhausting drive was intact in an audit in January 2011 however was discovered to be lacking throughout a “routine inspection” in May that 12 months.

Mr Hudson mentioned the modifications “appear to be designed to grab headlines, and not to progress the individual claims”, with NGN anticipated to argue at a listening to later this 12 months that an preliminary trial must be held over whether or not the claims have been introduced too late.

The listening to is because of conclude on Friday, and Mr Justice Fancourt is predicted to offer judgment at a later date.