[ad_1]
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., slammed reviews that Democrats are ginning up laws in response to the Supreme Court’s determination Monday to maintain former President Donald Trump off the 2024 poll.
“We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the Court wrote, including that “the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates.
According to a report published in Axios Monday, Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a former member of the Jan. 6 select committee, said he is already crafting federal legislation that would force Trump of the ballot.
But a spokesperson for Speaker Johnson told Fox News Digital on Monday night that his Democrat colleagues should “get a grip.”
SUPREME COURT RULES UNANIMOUSLY FOR TRUMP IN COLORADO BALLOT DISQUALIFICATION DISPUTE
Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.
“Democrats want to get a grip. In this nation, the American folks resolve the subsequent president—not the courts and never the Congress,” the spokesperson said.
According to the Axios report, Raskin referenced legislation he introduced in 2022 with Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla. that would allow the Justice Department to sue to keep candidates off the ballot under the 14th Amendment.
“We are going to revise it in gentle of the Supreme Court’s determination,” Raskin told the outlet. He suggested that the bill would be paired with a resolution declaring Jan. 6 an “rebel” and that those involved “engaged in rebel.”
Trump is dealing with a variety of federal costs associated to the 2020 election, however he has not been charged with rebel.
Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)
In the Supreme Court’s ruling Monday, the nine justices unanimously agreed that states don’t have Section 3 enforcement authority. But Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson said that the majority went two far when it said Congress has sole enforcement authority.
“The majority broadcasts that a disqualification for rebel can happen solely when Congress enacts a explicit sort of laws pursuant to Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment. In doing so, the bulk shuts the door on different potential technique of federal enforcement,” The trio said.
The Supreme Court justices. (Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States via Getty Images)
“The Court right this moment wanted to resolve solely a single query: whether or not a person State might maintain a Presidential candidate discovered to have engaged in rebel off its poll. The majority resolves rather more than the case earlier than us. Although federal enforcement of Section 3 is under no circumstances at subject, the bulk broadcasts novel guidelines for the way that enforcement should function,” the three wrote.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“It reaches out to resolve Section 3 questions not earlier than us, and to foreclose future efforts to disqualify a Presidential candidate below that provision,” the three mentioned.
Rep. Raskin’s workplace didn’t instantly reply to Fox News Digital’s request for remark.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink