[ad_1]
A Reddit user who angered a sibling after shopping for the sister’s baby a dog toy as a alternative stuffed animal did nothing improper, different customers on the platform pronounced.
“AITA? I purchased a non-traditional toy for my niece,” mentioned Reddit user “Solid-Feature-7678” in a latest put up on Reddit’s “Am I the A–hole” subreddit.
In the put up, the person mentioned the toddler niece “had this lamb toy that she loved” — however that she tends to be fairly tough along with her toys.
WOMAN ON REDDIT IS CONFUSED BY BOYFRIEND’S NEGATIVE REACTION TO HER CARE PACKAGE: ‘UNGRATEFUL DUDE’
“The poor little fluffball has gone to stuffed animal heaven,” mentioned the poster on the thread, not specifying a explicit gender.
The niece was “heartbroken” over the lack of her beloved toy, apparently — so Solid-Feature-7678 determined to purchase her a new one.
“All of the stuffed lambs that I looked at were just as fragile as before, but when I was getting some treats for my pooch I was struck by the sight of a lamb chop dog toy,” wrote Solid-Feature-7678.
The individual added, “I had a brilliant idea.”
Since the toy was “made to be chewed on and clawed on,” Solid-Feature-7678 figured “it should be able to handle [any] abuse from a toddler.”
The individual continued, “So I bought it and on Saturday I was watching my niece for my sister and [brother-in-law]. I gave my niece the toy and she loved it.”
The toy had a squeaker, one thing the niece “really liked,” mentioned the unique poster.
The kid’s mom, nonetheless, was lower than thrilled with the reward.
“My sister completely [lost it],” wrote the individual on Reddit.
“You bought my baby a dog toy!” the sister apparently started screaming.
Afterward, Solid-Feature-7678’s sister despatched the Reddit poster a collection of texts criticizing the reward, “along with some choice expletives thrown in for good measure.”
The remainder of the household was reportedly divided concerning the reward, with the poster’s mom saying it was not acceptable, whereas a stepfather and stepbrother discovered it “funny as hell.”
The “[brother-in-law] is quietly amused, but is keeping his head down,” mentioned Solid-Feature-7678.
REDDIT USERS DEFEND MAN WHO SERVES A LOWER-GRADE STEAK TO HIS IN-LAWS (HIS WIFE HAS A BEEF WITH IT)
Meanwhile, the younger niece is seemingly smitten with the brand new toy.
“My sister took the [toy] away and my niece had a meltdown until she gave it back, so now I am getting the double stink eye from her,” wrote Solid-Feature-7678.
“And my niece still loves her Fluffball.”
The individual requested others, “So AITA? I was just trying to make my niece happy.”
Fox News Digital reached out to the Reddit poster for any updates or further details about the scenario.
On the AITA subreddit, folks can reply to posts and point out the poster is “NTA” (“Not the A–hole”), “YTA” (“You’re the A–hole”), “NAH” (“No A–holes Here”) or “ESH” (“Everyone Sucks Here”).
Users can “upvote” responses they assume are useful and “downvote” those that aren’t.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER
In the a whole lot of replies to the put up, most Reddit customers agreed that Solid-Feature-7678 was “NTA” – and that the scenario was truly fairly humorous.
“It’s not like it will do her any harm. It might drive the parents crazy with the squeaking. It’s definitely a thinking-outside-the-box solution to please a rough-play toddler,” mentioned Reddit user “Doktor_Seagull” in the top-upvoted remark.
The identical user continued, “I’m in the same court as stepfather and stepbrother. This is more funny than outrageous, and will probably make for an excellent family gathering story in [the] future. Your sister needs a better sense of humor.”
“NTA. Toys are toys. It’s not like you suggested that they change her name to Fido, for God’s sake,” mentioned one other user in a prime remark.
Still one other Reddit user admitted to purchasing a baby some dog toys as properly.
“NTA. I purchased my 2-year-old a caterpillar dog toy at Petsmart in the present day when she requested,” wrote user “No-Independent-433.”
“It only matters if the dog slobbers on it first — otherwise it’s just a toy,” the identical user mentioned.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
The Consumer Product Safety Commission doesn’t regulate pet toys, mentioned its web site.
Fox News Digital reached out to Multipet, the corporate that produces and sells formally licensed Lamb Chop dog toys.
For extra Lifestyle articles, go to www.foxnews.com/life-style.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink