Woman ‘throws a tantrum’ when her child wasn’t invited to childfree wedding

3 minutes, 27 seconds Read

[ad_1]

A standard debate when planning a wedding is whether or not or not to enable kids, and the way to deal with some invitees who may not help the idea of a childfree wedding.

In a latest Reddit submit shared to the favored “Am I The A**hole” subreddit, a lady defined that her sister was getting remarried and was having a childfree wedding, however she was the one particular person on both facet of the household that had a child.

“Yesterday we got her wedding invitation and to my surprise, it said that the wedding is childfree and my child isn’t invited,” the Reddit submit learn. “My child is 17yo, going 18 soon. Btw my child is the only one under 18 in our family (and in the groom’s family) so she is the only one being excluded.”

She then referred to as her sister to affirm whether or not or not she was “serious” about having no kids allowed at her wedding.

“She said ‘I’m sorry but we have decided that we want a childfree wedding.’ I told her to just say you want a ‘my child’ free wedding and get over with it because this is exactly what you are doing. We got into an argument and she told me to stop throwing a tantrum and my child doesn’t need to be included in everything,” the submit continued.

The bride’s sister then knowledgeable her that she wouldn’t be attending the wedding due to the choice main to the bride calling her “an a**hole” for not supporting her.

Soon after posting, many individuals took to the feedback to defend the Reddit poster, noting that her daughter doesn’t match the conventional child age and is just too previous to be excluded from a wedding.

AITA for “throwing a tantrum” because my child wasn’t invited to a childfree wedding?
byu/Eastern-Second-2528 inAmItheAsshole

“The people defending the sister in this with the ‘her wedding/her rules’ are so infuriating. It’s antisocial behavior, exclusionary, and just s****y,” one remark started.

“I’m proud of you for defending your daughter OP. The people acting like she’s not a person with feelings, an entire human being because she is 17 are entirely disgusting and there’s absolutely no justification for it. I wouldn’t support my sister doing that either. This isn’t some friend and OP’s daughter isn’t some auxiliary guest. She’s a member of the family, and the only one being excluded.”

Another commenter agreed, writing, “Child free weddings usually mean ‘I don’t want the 3 yo throwing a tantrum during our first dance’ and while there are ways to arrange childcare/ rules that allow a wedding to be nice and undisturbed by kids attending, I can see why some opt for a child free one.”

“In this case though that’s just nonsense. Your daughter is a minor, but not more of a child than her 18yo cousin. What your sister does is othering and not okay. Calling it ‘child free’ is just an excuse.”

Other commenters agreed that there was nothing mistaken with not wanting a toddler or possibly even a child below 10 years previous at their wedding, however 18 was a excessive cutoff age.

“I feel like normally it would be a ‘their wedding, their rules’ situation and I’d say grow up and get over it, BUT this is not that situation,” one commenter identified.

“Your grown (pretty much) child is literally the only one being excluded. I can’t even imagine what is probably going through that 17 y/o girl’s head right now. She’s probably wondering why her family doesn’t like her. You should definitely talk to her and make sure she knows that some people are just ridiculous about their stupid wedding and that she didn’t do anything wrong. Make sure she knows this is not her fault somehow.”

[ad_2]

Source hyperlink

Similar Posts