[ad_1]
Two of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices issued a fiery dissent Tuesday after the high court docket declined to hear a case difficult a Virginia high school’s admissions program that allegedly discriminates towards Asian Americans.
A coalition of oldsters of scholars at Thomas Jefferson High School, the nation’s top-ranked high school, appealed to the Supreme Court claiming that the Ivy League feeder imposes a roundabout means of filtering for race in admissions that they are saying violates the Supreme Court’s June 2023 ruling on affirmative motion in faculty admissions. That case determined that using race as a think about faculty admissions is a violation of the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause.
Justices Samuel Alito, joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, dissented from the court docket’s denial on Tuesday, calling the decrease court docket’s determination within the case “patently incorrect and dangerous.”
“What the Fourth Circuit majority held, in essence, is that intentional racial discrimination is constitutional so long as it is not too severe. This reasoning is indefensible, and it cries out for correction,” Alito stated in his 10-page dissent.
Thomas Jefferson High School is being accused of racial discrimination in its admissions insurance policies.
Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology in Alexandria, Virginia, serves as a robust monitor to the Ivy League. Parents within the area compete fiercely for a spot, with present admissions costing $100 per software and focusing closely on standardized testing as a measure of analysis.
The Fairfax County School Board has tried to deal with racial disparities among the many scholar physique, significantly the low numbers of Black and Hispanic college students. While the school doesn’t expressly filter for race, it as an alternative applied geographic quotas, guaranteeing admission to the highest college students of every center school within the county. The school additionally factored revenue into the equation.
However, a mother and father group referred to as the Coalition for TJ, represented by the Pacific Legal Foundation, filed a lawsuit claiming the follow was unconstitutional and discriminated towards Asian American college students.
“Asian-American students, many of whom are immigrants or the children of immigrants, have often seen admission to TJ as a ticket to the American dream,” Alito wrote in his dissent.
LEFT’S FAVORITE ‘WOKE’ INITIATIVE UNDER SERIOUS THREAT AFTER COURT’S CONTROVERSIAL RULING
The U.S. Supreme Court. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin)
“In this respect, their aspirations mirror those of young people from other immigrant groups. Public magnet schools with competitive admissions based on standardized tests have served as engines of social mobility by providing unique opportunities for minorities and the children of immigrants, and these students’ subsequent careers have in turn richly contributed to our country’s success,” he continued.
Alito defined that the Court of Appeal’s determination, in his view, was “indefensible” as a result of, beneath its reasoning, the school might have adopted a coverage designed solely to scale back the Asian-American provide price and nonetheless evade legal responsibility.
GOP LAWMAKERS APPLAUD SUPREME COURT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION RULING: ‘GREAT DAY FOR ALL AMERICANS’
Justice Samuel Alito authored a 10-page dissent within the case towards the Virginia high school. (Erin Schaff/The New York Times by way of AP, Pool, File)
“The holding below effectively licenses official actors to discriminate against any racial group with impunity as long as that group continues to perform at a higher rate than other groups,” he stated.
“The Court’s willingness to swallow the aberrant decision below is hard to understand. We should wipe the decision off the books, and because the Court refuses to do so, I must respectfully dissent,” he stated.
Pacific Legal Foundation senior legal professional Joshua Thompson stated that “the Supreme Court missed an important opportunity to end race-based discrimination in K-12 admissions.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Discrimination against students based on their race is not only ethically wrong but also a clear violation of the Constitution’s guarantee of equal protection. Schools should evaluate students as individuals, not as groups based on racial identity,” he stated.
Fox News Digital’s Anders Hagstrom contributed to this report.
[ad_2]
Source hyperlink