Late Queen ‘infuriated’ by Harry and Meghan’s claim over naming of daughter Lilibet

3 minutes, 14 seconds Read

[ad_1]

The late Queen Elizabeth was infuriated by Harry and Meghan Markle’s claim that she had accredited them naming their daughter Lilibet, a brand new ebook has reported.

In 2021, Harry and Meghan introduced their daughter’s beginning and stated in a press release that she was named after the Queen, whose household nickname is Lilibet.

However, a brand new autobiography by royal journalist Robert Hardman has stated the late Queen was “as angry as I’d ever seen her” after the couple acknowledged she had been “supportive” of the title.

The ebook, which is presently being serialised within the Daily Mail, additionally claims the Sussexes had been “rebuffed” by Buckingham Palace once they requested them to again up their claim publicly.

Lilibet was born in California on June 4, 2021 and was named after the late Queen Elizabeth’s affectionate nickname

(Misan Harriman/Duke and Duchess of Sussex/EPA)

The ebook reads: “One privately [member of palace staff] recalled that Elizabeth II had been ‘as angry as I’d ever seen her’ in 2021 after the Sussexes announced that she had given them her blessing to call their baby daughter ‘Lilibet’, the Queen’s childhood nickname.

“The couple subsequently fired off warnings of legal action against anyone who dared to suggest otherwise, as the BBC had done. However, when the Sussexes tried to co-opt the Palace into propping up their version of events, they were rebuffed.”

Shortly after Lilibet’s title was introduced, the BBC reported a palace supply saying that the Queen “was not asked by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex about naming their daughter Lilibet”.

Harry and Meghan reportedly threatened authorized motion towards the BBC after they reported a palace supply saying that the Queen was not requested concerning the title

(AP)

As a outcome, the couple accused the broadcasters of libel however in keeping with Mr Hardman the risk of authorized motion “evaporated and the libel action against the BBC never materialised”.

At the time, Harry and Meghan’s spokesperson stated: “The Duke spoke with his family in advance of the announcement, in fact his grandmother was the first family member he called.

“During that conversation, he shared their hope of naming their daughter Lilibet in her honour. Had she not been supportive, they would not have used the name.”

Lilibet was the childhood nickname of the late Queen which was reportedly solely used by her mother and father, Princess Margaret and Prince Phillip, and just a few shut pals.

Mr Hardman is greatest recognized for his work on the Royal household. He has labored for the Daily Mail since 2001 and wrote the Sunday Times Book of the Year 2022, Queen of Our Times.

Other revelations within the ebook embrace a brand new perception into Harry’s relationship along with his father, King Charles.

It says that whereas the King was “extremely said” about Harry’s estrangement, he now feels as if “he has done what he can and now he is King, there are many more things to think about”.

The ebook claims Prince William felt a suggestion that he had married Princess Catherine as a result of she ‘fit the mould’ was ‘the lowest of the low’

(POOL/AFP through Getty Images)

However, the ebook additionally quotes a senior official as saying Charles will “always” go away the door open for his youngest son.

The ebook additionally says that neither King Charles or Prince William have learn Harry’s memoir, Spare, however workers have knowledgeable them of “key points”.

The Independent has contacted Buckingham Palace for a response to the ebook’s revelations.

Charles III: New King. New Court. The Inside Story by Robert Hardman, is out in hardback on 18 January.

[ad_2]

Source hyperlink

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *