BrewDog: How the anarchic brewery went from progressive to problematic

Sign up to IndyEat’s free e-newsletter for weekly recipes, foodie options and cookbook releases

Get our foods and drinks e-newsletter totally free

Oh expensive, BrewDog.

A case of how may it probably get any worse? And then it did.

In a letter to employees, CEO James Brown stated all new employees would now be paid £11.44 per hour nationwide – the nationwide dwelling wage. That means bar employees outdoors London will see their pay go up by round 5 per cent. Doesn’t sound so dangerous? It additionally means employees in London can have their hourly pay frozen – a real-terms pay lower.

Apparently a “unique bonus scheme” that features a entire additional £1 an hour in the event that they surpass customer support requirements for that month and “pawternity” go away, supplied by a BrewDog spokesperson after the information, couldn’t soften the blow. In a metropolis dealing with higher-than-average dwelling prices and rents greater than double the nationwide common, employees have been understandably fuming.

Brown stated it was a “hard decision” that they had to make in the face of a buying and selling loss in 2023. Could which have something to do with a string of different missteps of late, maybe? For instance, dropping its B Corp standing after complaints of a working “culture of fear”, dealing with criticism over its “hypocritical” stance on the 2022 World Cup (for a lot the identical causes) and one among its founders being accused of inappropriate behaviour, which he denies. Oh, and in addition the beer being fairly rank.

Outlandish advertising stunts and a penchant for bending the guidelines used to be what made BrewDog stand out. Actually, it’s nonetheless what makes them stand out, albeit for a lot extra nefarious causes.

It all began in 2007, again when microbrewing (and white males with a “let’s f*** s*** up” perspective) was fashionable and never annoying. Fed up with the UK beer market, Martin Dickie and James Watt based BrewDog in a small fishing port in northeast Scotland, after they have been simply 24. With the assist of some scary financial institution loans, they began brewing tiny batches, filling bottles by hand and promoting their first beers at native markets out of a crushed up previous van. It was a really “them vs us” ethos; us, the unbiased rebels taking up them, the boardroom breweries. It all sounds very noble. Oh how the tables flip. They typically do.

But it labored. A take care of Tesco obtained them off the floor, and so they rolled up their sleeves and obtained began with what they actually got here right here to do. Make noise and irritate individuals.

The loudest and most memorable of which was most likely a marketing campaign referred to as The End of History, for which whopping 55% ABV bottles of beer have been stuffed down the necks of taxidermy roadkill. The world’s strongest and costliest (at £500-£700) beer at the time, by the use of the corpses of stouts, squirrels and hares. This was a present for the high 10 devotees in the US who had invested greater than $20,000 in the agency. How good. If solely I’d invested! I’m unhappy to have missed the deer’s head dispenser that got here a yr later. Or the taxidermy cats that have been chucked over the City of London from a helicopter to rejoice one other crowdfunding run.

Loud and proud campaigns have been their factor, a lot to the chagrin of the Portman Group, a social duty physique for alcohol in the UK (they’ve obtained one thing of the British antipathy in direction of something remotely enjoyable about them). They first accused BrewDog of aggressive advertising ways, or fairly merely pointed them out. BrewDog received the case and in response launched Speedball – in reference to a drug cocktail – to “give them something worth banning us for”. It was, and renamed Dogma. I’m wondering what they’ll be naming their response to this newest criticism. Cost-of-Giving a Crap? Poverty Pours? BrewDog, DM me. There was additionally a kerfuffle in Tokyo over BrewDog claiming to have produced the strongest beer ever made, at 18.2%. Again, they responded by placing out the 32% Tactical Nuclear Penguin, and later the 41% Sink the Bismarck. They by no means miss a possibility, do they?

Some campaigns appeared only for enjoyable. There was the time Dickie and Watt (not a watershed comedy duo) drove a tank down Camden High Street to announce their first opening south of the border. Or after they put out the Royal Virility Performance for Prince William and Kate’s marriage ceremony, a beer that contained viagra and sexy goat weed. After an awards snub, they projected a picture of themselves bare however for a single BrewDog beer onto the Houses of Parliament. To promote their Elvis Juice, Dickie and Watt tried (and failed) to legally change their names by Deed Poll to Elvis. They additionally employed a Little Person to take up residence outdoors Westminster for every week with a placard that learn “Size matters” to marketing campaign for ⅔ measures in pubs. Surprisingly, that one labored and nobody had a lot to say about it.

Other campaigns lent extra in direction of the political. Portman returned in 2014 to assault BrewDog for encouraging “anti-social behaviour and rapid drinking”. No… actually? In a completely measured response, they launched Hello My Name is Vladimir with a picture of the Russian president saying it was “not for gays” forward of the Sochi Winter Olympics. Sticking with sport, in addition they launched a hibiscus wit beer devoted to Sepp Blatter as an unofficial bid for Scotland to host the 2022 World Cup. It got here with the directions: “Best served from brown paper envelopes to aid drinking with greased palms,” in reference to the Fifa president’s dodgy dealings.

But the masks of woke beer brewers with a degree to make started to slip. In one crowdfunding advert, Dickie and Watt dressed up as intercourse employees. A petition saying the video mocked intercourse employees in addition to transgender girls garnered greater than 36,000 signatures. The launch of Pink IPA, a restricted version bottle of its best-selling beer, coincided with International Women’s Day and supposed to spotlight the gender pay hole with the phrase… watch for it… “Beer for Girls” and a 20 per cent low cost for anybody who identifies as feminine. The Portman Group lashed again, ruling that it breached its Code of Conduct. BrewDog stated: “We’re as bothered about this Portman Group ruling as we are any other – that is, not at all.”

What goes up, should come down. BrewDog’s rise had been aggressive, outrageous, generally ingenious. It stands to motive that their downfall can be too. Years of dangerous behaviour started to meet up with them. In 2021, a bunch of greater than 100 former BrewDog staff revealed an open letter accusing the firm of fostering a “culture of fear” through which employees have been bullied and “treated like objects”. The letter claimed the Scottish brewer had lower corners on well being and security, made guarantees it didn’t dwell up to, and created a “toxic” tradition that left some employees struggling from psychological sickness. “Being treated like a human being was sadly not always a given for those working at BrewDog,” the letter alleged. There was no intentionally named new beer in retaliation, however considerably of an apology after which a warning: that the allegations posed a “threat to all of our livelihoods”.

A yr later, BrewDog was the topic of a BBC Disclosure episode, through which former staff interviewed stated they discovered working there a “miserable and uncomfortable experience” and a few clients stated “they regret investing their savings in BrewDog”. The Guardian later revealed that Watt had employed personal investigators to receive data on individuals he believed have been propagating a smear marketing campaign towards him.

This, clearly, introduced criticism of BrewDog’s “anti-sponsorship” of the 2022 Fifa World Cup, through which they attacked Qatar for his or her mistreatment of migrant employees and criminalisation of homosexuality. By the finish of the yr, BrewDog had misplaced its B Corp Status, which provides certification of an organization’s moral dedication to the atmosphere, neighborhood and employees, although a B Lab spokesperson couldn’t remark as to why. Not that we would have liked them to.

Needless to say, these antics don’t make BrewDog immune to the hovering prices affecting companies in the business: rising vitality payments in addition to the rising value of hops, malt, CO2, cans, bottles and packaging. The agency reported an working lack of £24m in 2022, and although we received’t see outcomes for 2023 till later this yr, the firm’s feedback on the newest information point out it is likely to be on a downward spiral: “Even with this strong performance over Christmas, as a wider business there is no hiding from the fact that in 2023 we made a trading loss and despite many efforts in the past 12 months to reduce our spending we still need to find more ways to get this business back to profitability.”

But it’s not look. Nothing says it greater than a Twitter video from the agency from 2015 lambasting greater drinks corporations for purchasing into the British craft beer boon, through which Watt says: “Mega corporations care about costs, market share, dividends, valuations. They don’t care about beer.” Sure, however does BrewDog care about its individuals?